We would all like to believe that if we experienced a debilitating medical crisis or sustained a life threatening injury, professional care would be able to save our life. Society has developed sophisticated technology to connect people to care quickly, but it is far from perfect. Despite their best efforts, first responders still need people to learn First Aid and CPR Training St Louis to assist in emergencies.
As the population grows, the stresses and speed of business increase. Despite being surrounded by people, if one experiences a heart attack or was seriously injured, one would find themselves very much alone in a crowd. With the general health of the population in a difficult situation, this can be a serious societal threat.
Most people are inclined to help others, but when it comes to any form of medical care the situation changes. Many do not feel qualified to act in a medical emergency. Even though parents would definitely act in some way should their child suffer an injury or emergency medical condition, acting for people not a member of the family presents a bigger problem.
The conflict is not from a lack of desire to provide assistance or fear of action, but of repercussion. Most people are concerned that should they provide any assistance at all, they could be liable for their action. With such a litigious society, it is of little wonder that many people choose not to act.
Organizations like the Red Cross and Red Crescent do all they can to encourage people to get the skills which could make a big difference in the case of an individual crisis or a natural disaster, and work with legislators to develop protections for well meaning citizens. Still, there is a fear of litigation and the very real possibility a situation could be made worse if someone acts improperly.
Many organizations understand the complexities of rendering aid to a victim of disease or injury and work to make it easier. In the attempt to encourage the general population to help provide a societal safety net, legislation has been enacted. Still, with the very real risk that well-meaning aid can exacerbate a problem, most laws protect only those with some form of training.
There is also the natural reluctance to trying to gain the skills one might need in a medical situation, as most believe medicine and its practice are best left to the brilliant minds who study at medical schools. As complex as medical practice has become, lay persons have difficulty understanding their own diagnoses, prognoses and prescriptions. The notion that they could possibly have the ability to make a difference when someone or many people need health assistance seems problematic.
Fortunately, the medical profession has been able to distill the critical needs of a victim with a life threatening situation to a short, easily learned set of skills. Essentially it is referred to as the ABC approach, for airway breathing and circulation. Getting the information needed to save a life is not all that difficult or time consuming and will could make a life or death difference to a victim.
As the population grows, the stresses and speed of business increase. Despite being surrounded by people, if one experiences a heart attack or was seriously injured, one would find themselves very much alone in a crowd. With the general health of the population in a difficult situation, this can be a serious societal threat.
Most people are inclined to help others, but when it comes to any form of medical care the situation changes. Many do not feel qualified to act in a medical emergency. Even though parents would definitely act in some way should their child suffer an injury or emergency medical condition, acting for people not a member of the family presents a bigger problem.
The conflict is not from a lack of desire to provide assistance or fear of action, but of repercussion. Most people are concerned that should they provide any assistance at all, they could be liable for their action. With such a litigious society, it is of little wonder that many people choose not to act.
Organizations like the Red Cross and Red Crescent do all they can to encourage people to get the skills which could make a big difference in the case of an individual crisis or a natural disaster, and work with legislators to develop protections for well meaning citizens. Still, there is a fear of litigation and the very real possibility a situation could be made worse if someone acts improperly.
Many organizations understand the complexities of rendering aid to a victim of disease or injury and work to make it easier. In the attempt to encourage the general population to help provide a societal safety net, legislation has been enacted. Still, with the very real risk that well-meaning aid can exacerbate a problem, most laws protect only those with some form of training.
There is also the natural reluctance to trying to gain the skills one might need in a medical situation, as most believe medicine and its practice are best left to the brilliant minds who study at medical schools. As complex as medical practice has become, lay persons have difficulty understanding their own diagnoses, prognoses and prescriptions. The notion that they could possibly have the ability to make a difference when someone or many people need health assistance seems problematic.
Fortunately, the medical profession has been able to distill the critical needs of a victim with a life threatening situation to a short, easily learned set of skills. Essentially it is referred to as the ABC approach, for airway breathing and circulation. Getting the information needed to save a life is not all that difficult or time consuming and will could make a life or death difference to a victim.
No comments:
Post a Comment